Showing posts with label Marketing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marketing. Show all posts

Friday, June 23, 2017

What part of "Do Not Call" is it that MTN doesn't understand?


These are the people at MTN who are personally and collectively responsible for the failure of the company to observe even the most basic adherence to the concept of privacy or an understanding of what "Do Not Call" (for marketing purposes) means. Their names are:
  • PF Nhleko;
  • P Hanratty;
  • S Miller;
  • AF van Biljon;
  • NL Sowazi;
  • A Harper;
  • KP Kalyan;
  • NP Mageza;
  • MLD Marole;
  • AT Mikati;
  • KC Ramon;
  • J van Rooyen; and
  • S Kheradpir
To give you an example of how bad it is, yesterday I had to send the following email:
Dear Rishen, Kaveen and Bridget
You seem to have missed the point. I am assuming deliberately but will give you the benefit of the doubt and put it down to sheer bloody-minded incompetence.
I have *ALWAYS* been on your Do Not Call list. I made it clear when I first obtained my MTN number, and have repeated it every time I have renewed my contract. I have also complained to MTN before about this matter. Many times.
  • July 2011: http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2011/07/mtn8-competition-greed.html
  • May 2009: http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2009/05/another-mtn-disaster.html
  • Nov 2007: http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2007/11/mtns-marketing-incompetence-again.html
  • June 2007: http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2007/06/mtn-direct-breaks-law-again.html
  • Oct 2006: http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2006/10/mtns-marketing-incompetence.html
  • Aug 2006: http://donnedwards.openaccess.co.za/2006/08/mtn-sends-sms-spam-and-breaks-law.html
Since your company has known since 2006 that I do not wish to receive marketing communications, the fact that you supplied my name for marketing purposes to a third party is a clear violation of the ECT Act, plus the more recent privacy laws.
So what is it going to take to get MTN and its affiliates, subsidiaries and third party call centres to get the message? You clearly don’t seem to think that the bad publicity from my blog is motivation enough, so what is it going to be?
I also fail to understand why it is so desperately important for MTN to get me to renew my contract. You only offer 24 month contracts, not monthly or annual ones. I have my own phone and I will stick to my monthly renewal until I decide otherwise. I know this makes MTN nervous, and so you should be.
I await a suitable explanation. MTN’s marketing division clearly do not understand the concept of privacy or the desire not to be interrupted during a busy day with trivial and annoying marketing messages.
Looking forward to your reply,
Donn
It all started earlier this year when my 24 month MTN contract came up for renewal. I have a working phone, which I bought separately, and I decided to let the contract continue on a month-to-month basis. I told the person who called me that I had no interest in talking to them and they should not call again. I also blocked the number 083-123-7355 on my phone. So they tried calling on a different number 083-011-0100 and leaving voice messages. I called back and told them to take me off their autodial list. I made it very clear that I was not in the mood to be called by their marketing people.
But they persisted. They started calling my land line too. Yesterday they called twice. I found out that the company making these calls uses a bogus number 083-123-7355 for their call centre. You cannot call them on that number. This bunch
of crooksis called CCI SA and they have another call centre number 0861-262-241. When I called this number and complained about unsolicited calls the call centre agent was completely clueless and had no idea how to remove me from their list. Her supervisor, naturally, was "in a meeting".
I call them crooks because they made no attempt whatsoever to comply with the ECT Act, and they are not members of the Direct Marketing Association. That tells me that they are unscrupulous and dishonest and not to be trusted. They called me (twice!) today from 031-830-7200 to apologize and tell me that they have removed me from their call list. I pointed out that my details need to be blocked, so they aren't added again. So much for marketing ethics.
Yesterday I sent them the following email, cc'd to MTN:
Dear CCI
Please confirm that you have removed my contact numbers from your call centre databases and that you will no longer call me for any reason whatsoever on my cell phone number [redacted], or my land line number [redacted]
I should point out that my details have been on the DMASA Do Not Contact database for 12 years or so.
I am sick and tired of being contacted by yourselves on behalf of MTN, who should know better, and who have clearly violated the DMASA’s code of conduct by providing you with my details without my permission, and without informing you of my DMASA Do Not Call status.
Thanks in advance
Donn Edwards
Needless to say I have not had a reply from their email. But I did get a response from Bridget Bhengu, Senior Manager: Public Relations & Internal Communications. She referred the matter to Rishendren Damodaram, who roped in Kaveen Kalicharran, who "manages CCI". Rishen notified their Marketing Department and my name "has been removed from MTN Marketing", whatever that means. Probably not much. Hence my email at the top of this post.
It turns out that MTN are not members of the DMASA.
This would explain their unethical and illegal behaviour. Why am I not surprised?
Update Friday 23 June: I made a mistake in claiming that MTN are not a member of DMASA. They are listed on this page as "MOBILE TELEPHONE NETWORKS (PTY) LTD - SOUTH AFRICA". In spite of that they seem confused about how the Doc Not Call list works. And they seem to be blissfully unaware (or willfully ignorant) of the provisions of the ECT Act. Section 45 of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, no 25 of 2002. states the following:
45. (1) Any person who sends unsolicited commercial communications to consumers, must provide the consumer—­
(a) with the option to cancel his or her subscription to the mailing list of that person; and
(b) with the identifying particulars of the source from which that person obtained the consumer's personal information, on request of the consumer.
That implies that their call centre agents should be able to mark customers as "Do Not Call" by adding them to a do not call list maintained by the organisation. Clearly MTN doesn't know how to do this correctly. They should also be able to check their data against the DMA list before they hand over the data to third parties (it that is even legal any more). Clearly they failed to do this too. How convenient.
Update Friday 30 June: MTN called again, this time from 087-350-8555. They don't even have the ability to put my name on the do not call list, which is another clear violation of the ECT Act. Listen to the recording.
Update Thursday 10 August: My blocked call log shows that MTN called from 083-123-7355 again on 8th August and again today on the 10th August.

Wednesday, April 19, 2017

JoziBear 24/7: Customer Service Gone Wrong*

Earlier this week I became aware of a new startup in the taxi business, trying to compete with the likes of Uber and Zebra Cabs in Johannesburg. One of my gripes with Uber is they have no phone lines, so you have to reply on Twitter or email to talk to them.
Being cautious, I first asked if they had a phone number I could use. They replied and gave me the number 011-082-9825 which I duly added to my phone contacts, hoping I would never need to use it. How wrong I was.
I resolved to try using their service on my way home from gym on Tuesday. As it turned out I left gym early, and at 4.17pm I requested a ride from Victory Park Shopping Centre to my home.
Within seconds I got an SMS reply to say they would be finding a nearby driver. After that, nothing.
Bear in mind I'm sitting on the pavement outside the shopping centre, I've had a long day and I just want to go home. I check on the app and get this:
"Sorry, no trips to display". And a programmer's error message about a missing data id, or something. It was gone before I could get a screen shot. So at 4.23pm (after 5 minutes) I sent this tweet: No reply, even though they tweeted at 4.15pm and again at 4.30pm. Turns out that was a Twitter bot giving the illusion of human activity. Clearly no service via Twitter. So I tried the number on the SMS at 4.27pm (i.e after 10 minutes). No answer from 086-001-5666, just an automated message that says "The user you are trying to reach is unavailable". I have yet to get any kind of answer from that number. Presumably faulty.
So I try the landline number, 011-082-9825 hoping at least someone would answer. After all, this is a 24 hour a day operation. I get voicemail. I didn't leave a message. I was already waiting for them to "get back to me" with no results.
Instead, since I was trying out alternatives to Uber, I decided to give Zebra Cabs another go. The first time I installed their app I didn't get the SMS code they promised, and a call to their call centre wasn't particularly enlightening either. But this time I installed the app and it worked. By 4.33 I had requested a ride and by 4.57 I was home. My first trip with Zebra Cabs was a complete success.
At 9.09am this morning I gave twitter another try and decided to try calling again. The 086-001-5666 number still gave me "The user you are trying to reach is unavailable", but I did manage to speak to someone (I think it was Kampa) who said he had no idea what was going on because he had just got into the office. I pointed out that they advertise a 24/7 service and he promised to investigate.
At lunchtime I noticed another tweet from @JoziBear247 and wondered why they still hadn't replied. I decided to reply to every tweet they sent out until someone replied. It took several hours but by 3pm (23 hours after my first "help!" tweet) they finally replied, saying their "internet was down". SAY AGAIN!?. What was the social media person doing all day on his/her phone? Playing solitaire? Oh, wait. This is an internet startup. Of course they don't have smart phones. What was I thinking?
At 2.57 they send an email that reads:
From: Jozibear Sales&Marketing <jozibearjhb1@gmail.com>
Subject: Apology
Good day Donn.
I wish to convey my sincere apology on behalf of JoziBear for missing your trip yesterday.
I wish to advise that we are still adding drivers to our system to meet the demand. We could not get you a ride as all our drivers in your area were busy being the peak hour.
Furthermore, we could not reply to your messages on Twitter as our Internet was down since morning due to maintenance that just ended a while ago.
I wish to again apologise for the inconvenience cause you. We hope to serve you better next time should you give us a second chance.
Kind Regards,
So I get a "sincere apology" that turned out to be totally insincere when he blocked my Twitter account, and a load of lame excuses and justifications. No sense of concern or urgency. And this is the PR guy! The person who is supposed to put the customer first. Completely oblivious to how arrogant his "apology" sounds. He wasn't able to call me during the internet outage? Or send an SMS? He's obviously a very busy man. Can't answer his cell phone at 3.27 or his land line. Instead I get passed on to Mandla Zuma in "Operations" who was just as clueless as to why no one let me know they couldn't find a ride for me.
But wait, there's more! Read section 6 of their Privacy page:
6. Direct marketing
We only use your e-mail address and phone number for sharing our product related marketing messages if you have given consent via Jozibear 24/7 app during installation and registration. If you no longer wish to receive direct marketing messages, please email us at support@jozibear247.com
Nowhere in the installation or registration process was there any mention of providing consent for direct marketing. None. Nothing. Nor is there any mention of it on the app page in the Google Play store. There are some angry reviews about this, and I have written to support@jozibear247.com but not had a reply as yet. I doubt I'll get one either. I have CC'd Craig Geswindt, their CEO, so we'll see what happens.
All I want them to do is fix their systems so that other people don't get left stranded like I was. I'm certainly not going to put their app on my wife's phone until they do.
*Update Thursday 10am: The CEO called me personally. He understands the issues and is working to fix them. I don't envy these challenges, but if they are working on them I will cut them some slack. I'll try again in a month or so and see how things have improved.

Wednesday, August 12, 2015

Joburg Water gets upset about their Logo, but not the water quality

Petty bureaucrats mystify me. They always focus on the wrong thing in order to try to "control" their "message". The Twitter account of the Joburg Water supplier is no exception. Last week I got a severe case of Gastro by drnking tap water. I tweeted:
As is the nature of bureaucracy, nothing happened. They forgot about it, or the "scientists at Cydna forgot about it, or they realised that no one had tested the water in my area for some time and they weren't going to admit it.
Time passed and I eventually recovered from the Gastro after being on a drip and taking antibiotics for 3 days. I decided it was time to remind Joburg Water that they owed me an answer. No reply. So I tried being a bit more direct: Still no reply. So I decided to warn my fellow citizens that Joburg water isn't safe. Still no reply. So I decided to post my nifty little graphic in a reply to everything they tweet, until someone notices. Eventually they noticed a pattern. Finally they noticed. What a relief!
But someone at Joburg Water obviously had their pride injured. Because I started getting Direct Messages on Twitter. The first was to request the location of where my home is. Maybe they just wanted to turn off the water for a while, or dig up the road or something.
But I didn't get the gastro from home, because I drink bottled water or boiled water. I only drink tap water when I'm at the gym. (Not any more!) Then the officious tone kicked in. Nice of them to make up a new name for me:
So here we are. They want to sue me for ruining their "reputation" by using their logo in a tweet. I think they are over-reacting now to cover up how they failed to react before. Perhaps its time to get my City Councillor involved?

Thursday, August 09, 2012

DirectAxis ignores customer privacy laws to send spam

DirectAxis
DirectAxis is a division of business partner with Sanlam*. I am a Sanlam customer. DirectAxis sent me a marketing SMS (i.e. spam) on Wednesday at 9.15am. It read:
As a homeowner 1HOME by DirectAxis offers you SA's premium personal loan of up to R100,000 for any household or personal costs. Reply YES. Stop to opt out
Naturally, I was annoyed because they "know" I'm a homeowner, which is none of their business, and they found out my cell phone number by some devious, unethical or illegal means. So I replied "YES" to get them to call me and explain where they got my details from.
The lady from the call centre called me and asked for my wife. I asked what it was in connection with, and she referred to the SMS. I told her it was my phone she had called, and she said they knew my number because I own property. I asked if they were members of the Direct Marketing Association. She said no; she either lied or didn't know. Direct Axis Sa (Pty) Ltd is a member of the DMA. So told her to put my number on their Do Not Contact database, and told her I don't trust and won't do business with companies who go scurrying around trying to find my details without my permission.
Later, I Googled their name and found their web site www.directaxis.co.za, which states: "Direct Axis (SA) (Pty) Ltd is an authorised Financial Services Provider"*. It says nothing about their connection with
Sanlam, or that they are part-owned by FirstRand. However, when I looked for a photo of the MD of DirectAxis, I found it on the Sanlam web site, in the "Directors" section:
Mark Finlayson
So I wrote the following to Mark Finlayson, the MD:
Dear Mark
I received an unsolicited SMS message from your company today, touting your 1HOME product, whatever that is. Are you not aware that my name and number is on the DMA’s Do Not Contact list?
Please explain
Donn Edwards
His reply was not unexpected:
Hi Donn
I will check on why you received the promotion and revert[sic]** to you.
Regards
Mark Finlayson
DirectAxis
Tel: +27 21 764 3058 | Cell: +27 82 460 1657 | Switchboard: +27 21 764 3000 | Email: mark.finlayson@directaxis.co.za
Today I got an email from another member of the company, in reply to my question about where they got my number. He wrote:
Hi Donn,
I can confirm that we are in fact a member of the DMA and that we definitely would not have got your details from your blog. The guy looking after the 1Home marketing is currently looking into the detail of exactly where your details where obtained and why you received a promotion. I will have this feedback for you by the close of business tomorrow as today is a public holiday.
Regards,
Robert Gwerengwe
DirectAxis
So now we have a registered Financial Services Provider ignoring the Do Not Contact list of the DMA to send me spam. That's already a violation of the ECT Act, and probably the Consumer Protection Act as well.
How trustworthy are these people? To find out, I consulted the
HelloPeter web site, and found the following graph:
DirectAxis SPAM
Note how the industry average for spam complaints is around 2%, yet
DirectAxis is 16% (8 times greater). A browse through their list of complaints found several recent spam complaints among dozens of complaints about bad Billing/Accounts. Just as I suspected: not particularly trustworthy, especially with my data.


Update: *Loans from Sanlam Personal Loans are administered and managed by
DirectAxis, an authorised Financial Services Provider. Sanlam Personal Loans (Pty) Ltd Reg. No. 2001/016316/07, Registered Credit Provider (NCRCP272), is a joint venture between Sanlam Life Insurance Ltd and Direct Axis (SA) (Pty) Ltd. Reg. No. 1995/06077/07.

**On the subject of the usage of the word "revert": look it up, and you will find it means "to come or go back (as to a former condition, period, or subject)". So to say you will "revert to me" means that you will go back (regress?) to being me, which is insulting. It's almost as meaningless as "get back to me" when what you mean to say is "reply" or "respond" or "answer".

Update: Saturday 11th August: I finally received a reply from DirectAxis:
Dear Mr Edwards
Our 1Home offering is focussed on providing home owners with value by offering personal loans for home improvements.
Your details were included on the database of a company called Journey (they have associations with companies which have assisted people obtain home loans or enquire about home loan finance), who provide us with services for our 1Home offering.
As a result of a technical issue our routine daily check against the DMA opt-out records did not run on Wednesday. This is the reason that you were contacted despite being on the DMA's list. This technical issue has been resolved and you will no longer receive messages from us. Your records have been removed from the Journey database.
We have identified the call center agent who incorrectly informed you that we are not members of the DMA and we have ensured that this will not occur again in the future.
I trust the above gives you the clarity you require and apologise sincerely for any inconvenience. I would be very happy to discuss this matter further with you should you require further information.
Regards
Mark
How convenient to be able to blame it on a technical issue. I believe that as much as I believe the sincerity of the apology, given their track record on HelloPeter. It would appear that the "Journey" company mentioned in the reply is also a member of the DMA: Journey Customer Innovation Pty Ltd. So now we have two companies, both members of the DMA, ignoring the Do Not Contact database and spamming potential customers. How dumb is that?Also, none of this claptrap about "associations with companies which have assisted people obtain home loans or enquire about home loan finance" explains how they as a Financial Services Provider could abuse this information in such a way. It just doesn't sound ethical to me. But then I've yet to meet an ethical spammer.

Tuesday, April 03, 2012

How much sugar in "All Gold" Tomato Sauce? 36 spoons!

All Gold Tomato Sauce has been a family favourite for years. They claim there are 36 tomatoes in every bottle, but that's just advertising lies. Only recently have I asked the question: how much sugar is in the sauce?
Today I obtained the answer: 21.3g of sugar for every 100g (or was it ml?). So that means that a 700ml bottle has 150g of cane sugar, i.e. 35.5 teaspoons of sugar (4.2g). Ouch! Not so healthy after all, even though there are no preservatives. Still, it's better than "ketchup" which has all kinds of other nasties.
They have a version with artificial sweetener instead, but I think the health risks of that concoction must be pretty toxic. One has to ask why they need to put so much sugar in the product. To counteract the taste of the vinegar? The mind boggles. I mean, there's a teaspoon of sugar for every tomato in the bottle! I guess they had to "work hard to cram them all in".

Update: According to the label (which uses a very small font) there are 27g of carbs per 100g serving. That means that in a bottle there are 40g of carbs not comprising cane sugar. Divide that by 36, and you get some very small tomatoes, unlike the giant ones shown in the TV ad below. According to Answers.com: "One medium, whole, red, ripe, raw tomato, 2 3/5 inches in diameter and weighing 123 grams contains 5 grams of carbohydrates, on a year-round average." That means there would be 8 tomatoes in a bottle of tomato sauce, not 36. Since they actually use "reconstituted tomato paste", the ad agency claims about tomatoes have been all lies from the beginning, whichever way you look at it. I don't understand why food companies think it is OK to mislead the public like this.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

MTN8 Competition Greed

There are clearly no limits to how low MTN will stoop in order to recoup its advertising budget. Even if it means violating the WASPA code of conduct, not to mention the ECT Act and the Consumer Protection Act. When it comes to soccer, there are no rules; only greed.
In spite of the fact that my phone account is clearly marked as a "Do Not Contact" (for marketing messages) client, and in spite of the fact that I have contacted all WASPA members and asked them to put my on their DNC list, these knuckleheads decided to sent me the SMS shown above. Did I mention I'm also on the Direct Marketing Association's DNC list as well? MTN is a "Founding Member" of the DMA.
In spite of the fact that the message doesn't contain the mandatory "STOP" instructions, I dutifully wasted R1 and sent a STOP message to the 40570 number. I got the following reply:
So the way it works is this: MTN sends this message to a gazillion football fans, who each spend R1 (or more) to enter. Thus MTN earns R-gazillion in SMS charges, which it can offset against the cost of sponsoring the teams. The cost of the prize: 9 tickets it has already paid for. How cheap can you get?
Did I mention that they violated sections 5.1.3, 5.1.8, and 5.2.1 of the WASPA Code of Conduct? I have filed Complaint #13894 with WASPA.