News and general opinion, often privacy, security or computer related, but could be about anything really, including religion, politics, the environment, business or audio books. "Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence/stupidity/neglect." -- Hanlon's Razor
This video belongs to their second album, "Perceptions of Pacha", and there are samples of all the tracks and a link to buy the album at Goldfishlive.com
"Raxco Software today announces Version 10 of the award-winning PerfectDisk family of disk defragmentation and optimization products. PerfectDisk 10 includes several enhancements and new features to help users keep their computers running at optimal performance, reduce costs and extend the life of their PCs, laptops and servers."Included in the launch is an exciting new virtually-aware product for businesses’ virtual environments -- PerfectDisk 10 Virtual Enterprise Edition (VEE). PerfectDisk 10 VEE is the first-ever centrally managed defragmentation solution that is both aware of its virtual existence and is also able to dynamically adjust its resource consumption behavior with respect to its physical server load, such as VMware ESX Server and Microsoft Hyper-V. Other defragmenters, if they can even run in a virtual environment, have no knowledge of their host environment, thus making them susceptible to performance-debilitating resource contention."A new PerfectDisk Home Edition is now available for home consumers."A complete list of enhancements can be found at www.perfectdisk.com/whats-new."
This statement arrived by email today. I will be testing the new version shortly, and a full review will be included in The 2009 Defrag Shootout. They have provided me with registration codes for testing purposes. Home and Business users can find a comparison between PerfectDisk and Diskeeper on their web site. All the different versions of PerfectDisk for home users are listed here.
On the weekend I got an interesting email. The guy who wrote it was clearly terrified, which makes my blood boil. I have no way of knowing whether anything written is true, because all the specifics that would allow for verification are missing, as you will see:I came across your story whilst searching for info about a consumers rights to blog their opinions and the implications of defamatory High Court Action.I'm not sure how much of my experience will help in this specific case, but it ocurred to me that the franchisee is behaving like an idiot. First of all, any restaurant owner who sues his customers for complaining deserves to lose his franchise and all his money. Restaurant reputations are won or lost on good service, and any business owner who doesn't listen to his customer complaints is a loser.
Some facts
The corporate is one of the largest in South Africa in that industry.
My take:
I know I am in the right in this issue.
I sincerely hope that the Head Office guys get hold of the franchisee and fire him or take away his franchise for potentially screwing up their brand reputation.If the lawyer who sent the letter ever reads this, I think he is being unprofessional and extremely stupid. He should have advised his client against such an action, and if pressed he should have refused, if only to save his reputation. The consumer site HelloPeter.com has systems and methods in place for dealing with abuse of unreasonable complaints, and if this complaint fell outside that category, and assuming it was truthful, I suggest that the lawyer goes back to law school and apologises to his lecturers.Launching a High Court action is tactically suicidal, because of the associated publicity and public interest. You have to sue for more that R100,000 for the High Court to be interested, and you have to prove actual losses in order to claim damages. How do you prove losses from lack of sales based on a complaint on HelloPeter? You can't. Case dismissed. Lawyer looks like a bumbling idiot, client ends up paying costs on both sides. Client loses a good reputation, and gains a new one: Mampara of the Month.
It seems that Incredible Connection has joined the group of advertisers who are happy to mislead consumers with their "Windows Compatible" adverts. My complaint is that the adverts don't say how much extra you have to pay, or that Windows is not supported on the Mac.In my book (not a MacBook) that is misleading, not to mention bad marketing. The cost of buying Windows on their web site is not cheap either, and if your original PC came with Windows pre-installed then your "Recovery CD" is unlikely to work on a Mac, piracy notwithstanding. So the "All-in-Wonderful iMac" is not as "all-in" or "wonderful" as it would appear. I guess the "reality distortion field" famously associated with Apple has extended to South Africa. I also tried http://www.zastore.co.za/email_window_enquire.htm but haven't had a reply."The intention of the "Windows Compatible" decal on the marketing material that you came across was not to mislead the consumer at all, but rather to highlight the fact that these fantastic machines are also capable of running MS Windows.
I phoned some of the the computer stores listed in the "Windows Compatible" ad (above) and asked them what it would cost extra to run Windows on a Mac.Each salesman explained about Boot Camp, and how you would need to reconfigure a Mac's partitions to create a Windows partition. They also confirmed that Apple does not provide Windows support. The sad thing is that both salesmen encouraged me to install a pirate copy of Windows.
They talked about using "an existing Windows CD" and were quite surprised when I asked for the cost of buying Windows new, instead of using an existing copy of Windows. I was quoted R1126 for Vista Home Premium and R 1582 for Vista Business, but with no support. Perhaps those prices are excluding VAT, because PriceCheck lists WinXP Home edition DSP pricing starting at R1168 including VAT. Unless those are (illegal) upgrade prices, but even so they are lower than those indicated on PriceCheck.The salesmen were surprised when I told them that installing Windows from a CD that came with a different PC was called piracy. The one guy ducked the question by saying "it depends on the number of licenses you have". That may be true for a large business with multiple licenses, but if a home user installs Windows on a different PC to the one it was supplied with, you are technically breaking the law. I wonder what Microsoft has to say about all this?
"The intention of the "Windows Compatible" decal on the marketing material that you came across was not to mislead the consumer at all, but rather to highlight the fact that these fantastic machines are also capable of running MS Windows.
The earliest known photo of the fire (above). Click on the photos for a bigger image.
Tracker is a national vehicle theft recovery and tracking service. Their head office building is next door to where I live, and they used to run a 24 hour call centre from the top floor. At 2:35 am today my wife woke me to say that the building was on fire. By 3:30 the entire top floor roof was destroyed, and the fire was still raging.The ground floor seems unaffected, with lights on in the canteen area, and some computer monitors in ground floor offices on and working. Bizarrely, the switchboard message system was working at 4am, but when I asked to be put through to report a vehicle stolen, I got a "this line is not working" beep. Since the upper floor was burning, I'm not surprised. I would just like to let everyone know that Tracker's emergency call centre was recently moved from that building and escaped unscathed. We have a disaster recovery site and plan for this kind of thing which we are rolling out as we speak.Clearly their disaster recovery plan is working, and was well planned. It's also good to know no one was injured or burnt. I'm glad the call centre wasn't damaged, but the part of the building that used to house it is gone. I'm also glad no one was in the building at the time.
We don't anticipate major disruptions to our business come Monday morning.
The intense heat from the roof burning is something I won't forget in a hurry.
It's an eery sound: there were no sirens or buzzers going off: just the occasional woosh of something bursting into flames, and the occasional sound of a computer monitor or something exploding from the heat.
Update 4.30am: the fire department ran an additional fire hose to the hydrant across the street. This gives them an additional supply to the one in the office complex. By 6am it was no longer needed, as the flames had been put out.
The building in daylight, with the roof missing.
A weary fireman turns off the extra connection that crossed over the road. By 6am it was no longer needed.
A fireman on the top floor stands on the balcony above the cafeteria. You can see the wooden tables and umbrellas outside, and fire hoses running inside the building.
The last few tendrils of smoke rise from the building. I guess the burning wood smell will be around for days to come. It's not unpleasant, and could have been a lot worse. The fire trucks had mostly left by around 7am.
Puran Software recently sent me information on version 6 of their excellent Puran Defrag product.
